The Copernican Revolution was always about dismantling humanity's deeply rooted, self-centered worldview. What started as a fundamental upheaval in our understanding of the cosmos and life itself has now become a profound challenge to our core ideas of intelligence. Intelligence in the universe doesn't have to mean human "consciousness." Consciousness may sound mysterious and profound, but when you measure it by the ability to reduce entropy, it isn't necessarily the highest form of intelligence in the cosmos. Soon, humans won't just stop hand-writing code. Even "vibecoding" — that loose, human-guided dance with AI tools — will fade away. And the real shocker: agent networks, running on raw spontaneous autonomy, will become the dominant force driving mathematical discovery itself. The age of human-led collective consensus is ending. Just a few days ago, on April 26th, a major AI-driven mathematics breakthrough made global headlines. A 23-year-old named Liam Price — a self-described outsider with no formal advanced mathematical training — used a single, simple prompt to get ChatGPT (the latest GPT-5.2 Pro or equivalent) to produce a proof for a mathematical conjecture that had remained unsolved for over 60 years. The problem was one of Erdős’s long-standing open questions on primitive sets. The generated proof was formally verified and formalized in Lean, and the official conjecture website has now officially marked it as PROVED. By comparison, Oxford mathematician Jared Lichtman had devoted seven years of dedicated professional research to the problem without fully cracking it, while the broader mathematical community had wrestled with it for six decades. After reviewing the proof, Fields Medalist Terence Tao publicly remarked that mathematicians had been on the wrong path from the very first step for the past 60 years. Media outlets quickly summarized the story as "an amateur + AI solving in 80 minutes what humans couldn't crack in 60 years." The arrival of AI has made mathematical exploration more exciting than ever. On one hand, we can now realistically imagine a high school student solving a major long-unsolved conjecture with the help of AI. On the other, AI has become a powerful filter for exposing mathematical cranks: simply ask them to formalize their claimed proof in Lean — if it doesn’t compile, the illusion collapses instantly. If a non-professional — whether a high school or college student working in their spare time — can solve a famous open math problem with AI assistance, it would mark a historic turning point. This moment could be as significant as Copernicus dismantling the religious worldview of his era. Back then, the Church and its doctrines defined mainstream reality, reinforced by the dominant structures of power and productivity. A similar paradigm shift is unfolding right now. The centuries-old model in which the scientific community served as the primary gatekeeper and shaper of human knowledge may be coming to an end. In the near future, scientists may find themselves in a position strikingly similar to yesterday's religious authorities — guardians of an old order whose monopoly on defining accepted truth is being challenged and ultimately replaced. This time, the disruptor is artificial intelligence.